Stranger & Stranger

There is something oddly unsettling (but also very cool) about a deck of cards in which not a single card shares any design patterns… Look at the photo to the left. All of those cards are spades and all of them belong to the same deck.

And the latter you can only tell because the backs are the same. As weird as this feels, it’s exactly what design firm Stranger & Stranger did when they did a colab with Art of Play. When you take these out of the box, you aren’t just grabbing a pack of cards. You are opening a case with 54 artworks. You pay a hefty price for the privilege (at least you do here in Australia) but look at them, why wouldn’t you?

Ultimate Deck

This breaks all the rules! There is a pantomime, and a tree, and is that an acupuncture chart? It’s a bold move… Playability is out the door! But then, you wouldn’t take this to your bridge club. God forbid uncle Bob would spill his Tanqueray and OJ on these. This deck of cards is a convo starter, nobody in their right mind would actually use these, right? You look at these cards. And then you smack anyone that tries to touch them without gloves on.

Technicalities… 

The Ultimate Deck was designed by Stranger & Stranger for Art of Play and printed by USPCC. It’s available from the Art of Play site (link above) for $25 US. International shipping starts at $11.75 US. That makes the total in Outback dollars $55.60 against the current (at the time of writing) exchange rate. If you’d rather shop locally, and you should support local business, I can suggest Shuffler, Piper Magic or The Maker – Hobart, which happens to be a sustainable clothing store that also happens to sell playing cards. Because, why not?

If you are not in Australia, sorry but you are on you are on your own.

You know you want it!

In normal reviews you would now be told what you already know, that the card stock is excellent, that it feels fantastic in your hands… For magicians, that these are traditionally cut so they faro like crazy.  But you aren’t ever going to use these! Just buy them! It’s like a coffee table book for card nerds…

 

THE END.

 

 

My favorite company to hate is no more…. ahhhh!

CardCutz made some funky cards. Some designs worked really well, others totally did not. I own a few of them. Worx, I still hate that design… Neoteric, Awesomely fun… Deckade, instantly dated by the back design containing the number 2020 – A year nobody wants to remember anyway.  Besides the Worx deck, which simply doesn’t (work, that is) a lot of their cards seem to be 80’s inspired judging by the combination of neons and pastels. It’s hard to know what demographic they were going for with their original designs, if any…

Incidentally, I never actually ordered any of their originals. I got those as freebies with other orders. That’s telling I guess, if you give away your limited editions. That makes no sense! Cardcutz released 19 original designs over 3 years. Each of them seem to come in a limited run of 2500, so that is a total of  47,500 decks of cards. That is a lot of cardboard! I wouldn’t know how to move that quantity of playing cards either…I truly think that they grossly overestimated how popular these cards would be… Never mind that these are printed by USPCC on crushed stock, which should have move monkeys salivate. That stuff is glorious! Don’t believe me? Order a deck of Bicycle Elites (exclusive to Penguin Magic). You will thank me later!

Anywho, if you go to the CardCutz web site now, all you will see is a gallery of their designs, which you can’t buy from them because they sold out. A “Contact Us” button which simply goes to an email address and a link to findcards.com, where you will see that plenty of places around the world still stock their cards. But the price is not going up so, again, that should tell you something about how ill-fated the endeavour that was CardCutz really was. 

I think it was a bum move to make Australians (where CardCutz originates) pay exorbitant shipping by moving your operations to the US, but I don’t wish any kind of bad luck on anyone… So good luck in your next adventure!

PS.

If that sounded insincere after my last tirade about this company, it isn’t. Some of the CardCutz designs were good. I would have thought there was a market for them.  I think, much like myself, that the principals of the outfit overestimated demand. I was initially very excited to see an Australian company enter the playing card space… Too bad, it didn’t work out.

 

I like (am obsessed with) playing cards. I have said this before, I don’t know that I recall what came first magic or cards… Doesn’t really matter, I guess. I really like playing cards and I really like magic. The “pick a card” kind, not the “I am going to have you possessed by the spawn of my demon child” kind. The latter might come in handier than being able to guess someone’s card, but it’s so messy. You need cauldrons and the toe nails of the pope’s bastard son…

One of the things I have been playing with lately is stacks. That is the concept of being able to perform certain feats by virtue of knowing the order the cards are in. That sounds simple enough but it’s goddamn hard! In order to not have a spectator cotton on to the fact that the card are in a specific order, you have to make that order hard to recognize. So no, red-black-red-black-red-black. Or all the odd cards on one side and the even cards on the other. Actually, that may work… never mind. Problematically the harder you make it for a spectator to figure out, the harder it becomes for you to remember. Here is a random part of a stack I am trying to commit to memory at the moment: 6S, KS, 9H, 2S, 3C, 6H 10H, 4S, JD

See, there is no discernable pattern there. And there is 43 more where that came from. Granted there are quite a few magic effects created that require a stack but don’t require the performer to memorize it. That same stack I am studying now has two royal flushes built into it and you would never notice. All I have to do is remember where they start and how many hands to deal (The royal flush in hearts is for a 4- and the one in spades is for a 5-handed game). There comes a point though that you would want to use that stack for the ultimate trick. You think, just think of a card. You tell me what it is, I shuffle and *BOOM* your card is at the top. To do that I need to know the location of all 52 cards. 

And I suck at remembering things! There are certain facts that I can easily remember… The fact that three out of four nines in this particular stack are preceded by a two. Great! But they are not the same number of cards apart and because I don’t know that distance, it doesn’t help me. No, there comes a point where I just have to commit this to memory. But how? I have been starting at these cards for a week and didn’t get much further than knowing that the JS is the first card. What we need here is mnemonics!

Luckily I stumbled upon a 2014 book by Geoff Williams. It’s called “The Aronson Stack For Everybody” – There, now you finally know what card-order I have been talking about.  Simon Aronson devised this stack sometime in the 1970s (Geoff says 1976) a short time before Juan Tamariz came up with the infamous (among people into card tricks anyway) Mnemonica stack. Which, incidentally isn’t any easier to memorize than the Aronson stack, despite its name…

Geoff, in his book, describes a simple mnemonics system to more easily memorize the order of the cards. It isn’t particularly revolutionary but it was designed specifically around memorizing cards and the Aronson stack in particular. And in 70-odd pages he does a brilliant job of putting you well on your way to doing the impossible — Memorizing 52 cards in seemingly random order. Given that a large portion of the essay is dedicated to actual pictures of the mnemonic “peg words” he came up with (and some of them are truly nightmare inducing) this is about the quickest introduction to memory systems you can hope to find.

So how does it work?

For each card in the deck there are 2 word. One word describes the position in the stack, the other the value and suit of the card. The first card in the stack, “TOE JET” is the jack of spades. The practice and study aids in the book all use Geoff’s list of words, but you can come up with your own (as I did) if certain words don’t resonate with you. As Williams describes, it’s your brain! It needs to work for you!

You assign consonants to numbers and use these to represent numbers/positions in the deck. Single digits get one consonant, and double digit numbers get 2. T stands for one, N stands for 2, M stands for 3, R for 4. You now add vowels to make a word. For single digit numbers there is no second consonant and that is how the first card of the deck is “Toe”. This is followed by No, Me, Ray, Eel, Goo, Key, Fay, Pee – And there you have 1 through 9.

In Geoff’s book “No” was “Knee”. I found this to be extremely confusing. K is the letter that represents 7, but appears in the peg word as a silent letter for 3 values  — Knee (2) , Knob (29), Knife (28). I replaced these with No, Nap and Naff. All these break Geoff’s rule that peg words need to be a tangible object. 

Numbers and Letters

Now you have the places in the deck, you do the same for value and suit. The letters for values are T=1, N=2, M=3, R, L, G, K, F, P, S, J=Jack and H=Queen. That’s one through 12. The king is simply represented by its suit. So the king of spades is simply “SPADE”. Suits are T=Spades, N=Hearts, M, Clubs and R = Diamonds. For each card you take the consonant for value and the one for suit and make up a word with those. Ace of spades thusly becomes: Ace = 1 = T, Spades = 1 = T, combined this becomes TT. make a simple word with that and you might get “tit”. If body ink instead of a vulgar word for a woman’s breast is more your thing, you could use “tat”. If you are into Egyptian history, perhaps “tut”. The ace of spades in the Aronson stack sits in position 6 in the deck… “Goo Tit”

Each card gets two words. “Mom Jam” is the jack of clubs in position 33. 3 = M, so MM for 33. J for jack and M for clubs. With the letter combination MM JM you get “Mom Jam”  but it could equally be “Mime Jim”. A few more… Nap rain, Man Sore, Mug Jar, Muff Sin, Tag Foam, Tick Mat.

Bit weird, huh?

There are a few oddities with the suggestions from “The Aronson Stack For Everybody”. I already mentioned the use of the silent K. I replaced all those words. Nap used to be Knob (29). That also had the issue of being the only word using a B instead of a P for 9. Nap, removing that silent K also removes the need to memorize an exception to P = 9. The book also uses K and C interchangeably because, as the author argues, they sound the same. I guess Geoff has never traveled to Cincinnati or used cinnamon in his baking. I just write all words starting with a C with a K instead… Because that’s what the kool kids do. I left words ending in CK alone.

Lastly I replaced most words that had multiple syllables in the original essay. 

Does it work?

This is most definitely better than trying to brute force memorizing things. Within a few days of playing with the peg words I am really beginning to see a big difference in being able to memorize portions of the stack. I am nowhere near proficient, but I can get (however slowly) to a card value from a stack position or to a stack position from a card value for about half of the deck. There are still word combos that just don’t work well for me. “Nose Light” (Position 20 – 5 of spades)  Just doesn’t want to come to me… But overall the method in Geoff’s book has been a great help. And to think this has been around since 2014. Goo tit see for yourself!